Compare

USourceControl vs Plastic SCM / Unity VCS

Plastic SCM — rebranded as Unity Version Control — is a capable system with a steep surface area. USourceControl delivers the core of what game teams need, without the complexity or the Unity-specific pricing model.

At a glance

Engine scope
USourceControlEngine-agnostic (Unreal, Unity, Godot, custom)
Plastic SCM / Unity VCSUnity-first; works elsewhere but positioning is Unity-centric
Pricing model
USourceControlFlat per-user, free solo tier
Plastic SCM / Unity VCSBundled with Unity tiers; storage and seats billed separately
Client complexity
USourceControlSingle desktop app
Plastic SCM / Unity VCSMultiple clients (Gluon, Plastic GUI, CLI) with different audiences
Setup time
USourceControlUnder 5 minutes
Plastic SCM / Unity VCSLonger onboarding; cloud and on-prem variants to choose between
Branching model
USourceControlLightweight per-project workflow
Plastic SCM / Unity VCSPowerful but conceptually heavy (branch-per-task)
Large files
USourceControl10 GB per file, native
Plastic SCM / Unity VCSSupported, with tuning
Open-source client
USourceControlYes, MIT
Plastic SCM / Unity VCSProprietary

Why teams switch

Why teams choose USourceControl over Plastic

Simpler mental model

Plastic rewards teams that invest in its branch-per-task philosophy and multi-client setup. USourceControl stays close to what most game teams actually need: commit, sync, lock, restore. Less to learn, less to get wrong.

Engine-agnostic positioning

Plastic's roadmap is Unity-shaped — it's now Unity Version Control, after all. USourceControl treats Unreal, Unity, Godot, and custom engines as equal first-class citizens.

Transparent, independent billing

Plastic pricing is tangled up in Unity subscription tiers and seat economics. USourceControl bills per user, bundles storage and bandwidth, and has a free solo tier — no engine lock-in.

One app, every role

Plastic ships distinct clients aimed at programmers vs artists (Plastic GUI vs Gluon). USourceControl has one desktop app for everyone, so artists and engineers share a mental model.

When Plastic / Unity VCS fits better

Plastic is a strong tool and sometimes the better pick:

  • You want deep engine integration in the Unity Editor.
  • Your team benefits from branch-per-task workflows and semantic merge.
  • You need on-premise deployment with a polished commercial support contract.

FAQ

Common questions

Isn't Plastic SCM now Unity Version Control?

Yes. Unity acquired Plastic and rebranded much of it as Unity Version Control. The underlying technology is similar; the positioning, pricing, and Unity integration have shifted.

Does USourceControl integrate with the Unity Editor?

Not as an in-editor plugin today. The workflow is through the desktop app, which sits alongside the editor. Most teams find this easier because non-engineers don't need to use in-editor VCS UIs.

Can I migrate from Plastic to USourceControl?

Yes. The straightforward path is to sync your current working copy to USourceControl as a first commit. Full history import from Plastic isn't automated today but is possible as a service for Studio and Enterprise plans.

What about Plastic's semantic merge?

Plastic's semantic merge is excellent for C# code. If your team relies on it, keep your code in Plastic and use USourceControl for content that doesn't merge well (binaries). Many teams split this way.

Will USourceControl work with non-Unity engines?

Yes — Unreal Engine, Godot, and custom engines are fully supported. USourceControl has no engine-specific assumptions baked in.

Skip the complexity

Free for solo developers. Start a project in 5 minutes on any engine.

Start for free